南方科技大学知识苑(SUSTech KC): Understanding each other's models An introduction and a standard representation of 16 global water models to support intercomparison, improvement, and communication

题名	Understanding each other's models An introduction and a standard representation of 16 global water models to support intercomparison, improvement, and communication
作者	Telteu，Camelia Eliza 1; Müller Schmied，Hannes 1,2; Thiery，Wim 3; Leng，Guoyong 4; Burek，Peter 5; Liu，Xingcai 4; Boulange，Julien Eric Stanislas 6; Andersen，Lauren Seaby 7; Grillakis，Manolis 8; Gosling，Simon Newland 9; Satoh，Yusuke 10; Rakovec，Oldrich 11,12; Stacke，Tobias 13; Chang，Jinfeng 14,15; Wanders，Niko 16; Shah，Harsh Lovekumar 17; Trautmann，Tim 1; Mao，Ganquan18 ; Hanasaki，Naota 6; Koutroulis，Aristeidis 19; Pokhrel，Yadu 20; Samaniego，Luis 11; Wada，Yoshihide 21; Mishra，Vimal 17; Liu，Junguo18 ; Döll，Petra 1,2; Zhao，Fang 22,23; Gädeke，Anne 24; Rabin，Sam S.25; Herz，Florian 1
发表日期	2021-06-24
DOI	10.5194/gmd-14-3843-2021
发表期刊	Geoscientific Model Development 影响因子和分区
ISSN	1991-959X
EISSN	1991-9603
卷号	14 期号:6页码:3843-3878
摘要	Global water models (GWMs) simulate the terrestrial water cycle on the global scale and are used to assess the impacts of climate change on freshwater systems. GWMs are developed within different modelling frameworks and consider different underlying hydrological processes, leading to varied model structures. Furthermore, the equations used to describe various processes take different forms and are generally accessible only from within the individual model codes. These factors have hindered a holistic and detailed understanding of how different models operate, yet such an understanding is crucial for explaining the results of model evaluation studies, understanding inter-model differences in their simulations, and identifying areas for future model development. This study provides a comprehensive overview of how 16 state-of-the-art GWMs are designed. We analyse water storage compartments, water flows, and human water use sectors included in models that provide simulations for the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project phase 2b (ISIMIP2b). We develop a standard writing style for the model equations to enhance model intercomparison, improvement, and communication. In this study, WaterGAP2 used the highest number of water storage compartments, 11, and CWatM used 10 compartments. Six models used six compartments, while four models (DBH, JULES-W1, Mac-PDM.20, and VIC) used the lowest number, three compartments. WaterGAP2 simulates five human water use sectors, while four models (CLM4.5, CLM5.0, LPJmL, and MPI-HM) simulate only water for the irrigation sector. We conclude that, even though hydrological processes are often based on similar equations for various processes, in the end these equations have been adjusted or models have used different values for specific parameters or specific variables. The similarities and differences found among the models analysed in this study are expected to enable us to reduce the uncertainty in multi-model ensembles, improve existing hydrological processes, and integrate new processes.
相关链接	[Scopus记录]
收录类别	SCI
语种	英语
学校署名	其他
WOS记录号	WOS:000667951100004
Scopus记录号	2-s2.0-85108721552
来源库	Scopus
引用统计	被引频次[WOS]：58
成果类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://sustech.caswiz.com/handle/2SGJ60CL/230171
专题	工学院_环境科学与工程学院
作者单位	1.Institute of Physical Geography,Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt,Frankfurt am Main,60438,Germany 2.Senckenberg Leibniz Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F),Frankfurt am Main,60325,Germany 3.Department of Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering,Vrije Universiteit Brussel,Brussels,1050,Belgium 4.Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes,Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing,100101,China 5.Water Security Research Group,Biodiversity and Natural Resources Program,International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis,Laxenburg,2361,Austria 6.Center for Climate Change Adaptation,Climate Change Impacts Assessment Research Section,National Institute for Environmental Studies,Tsukuba,3058506,Japan 7.Earth System Analysis,Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research,Potsdam,14473,Germany 8.Institute for Mediterranean Studies,Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas,Rethymno,74100,Greece 9.School of Geography,University of Nottingham,Nottingham,NG7 2RD,United Kingdom 10.Earth System Division (Earth System Risk Analysis Section),National Institute for Environmental Studies,Tsukuba,3058506,Japan 11.Department Computational Hydrosystems,UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research,Leipzig,04318,Germany 12.Faculty of Environmental Sciences,Czech University of Life Sciences Prague,Prague,16500,Czech Republic 13.Institute of Coastal Research,Geesthacht,Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon,21502,Germany 14.College of Environmental and Resource Sciences,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou,310058,China 15.Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement,CEA-CNRS-UVSQ/IPSL,Université Paris Saclay,Gif-sur-Yvette,91191,France 16.Department of Physical Geography,Utrecht University,Utrecht,3508,Netherlands 17.Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar,Palaj, Gandhinagar,382355,India 18.School of Environmental Science and Engineering,Southern University of Science and Technology,Shenzhen,518055,China 19.School of Environmental Engineering,Technical University of Crete,Chania,73100,Greece 20.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,Michigan State University,East Lansing,48824,United States 21.Biodiversity and Natural Resources Program (BNR),International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis,Laxenburg,2361,Austria 22.Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science (Ministry of Education),School of Geographic Sciences,East China Normal University,Shanghai,200241,China 23.Transformation Pathways,Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research,Potsdam,14473,Germany 24.Climate Resilience,Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research,Potsdam,14473,Germany 25.Karlsruhe Institute of Technology,Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research Atmospheric Environmental Research,Garmisch-Partenkirchen,82467,Germany
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Telteu，Camelia Eliza,Müller Schmied，Hannes,Thiery，Wim,et al. Understanding each other's models An introduction and a standard representation of 16 global water models to support intercomparison, improvement, and communication[J]. Geoscientific Model Development,2021,14(6):3843-3878.
APA	Telteu，Camelia Eliza.,Müller Schmied，Hannes.,Thiery，Wim.,Leng，Guoyong.,Burek，Peter.,...&Herz，Florian.(2021).Understanding each other's models An introduction and a standard representation of 16 global water models to support intercomparison, improvement, and communication.Geoscientific Model Development,14(6),3843-3878.
MLA	Telteu，Camelia Eliza,et al."Understanding each other's models An introduction and a standard representation of 16 global water models to support intercomparison, improvement, and communication".Geoscientific Model Development 14.6(2021):3843-3878.