中文版 | English
题名

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of lasmiditan and CGRP-antagonists for the acute treatment of migraine in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials

作者
发表日期
2024-02-05
DOI
发表期刊
ISSN
1129-2369
EISSN
1129-2377
卷号25期号:1
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes associated with the use of lasmiditan, rimegepant, ubrogepant, and zavegepant for the acute management of migraine headaches. METHODS: We searched four electronic databases from database inception to August 31, 2023, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that report efficacy and safety for the acute treatment of migraine. The risk of bias in the included RCTs was evaluated according to the Cochrane tool, and the certainty of evidence using the CINeMA approach. We conducted frequentist network meta-analyses (NMA) to summarise the evidence. Data were analyzed using R-4.3.1. RESULTS: A total of 18 eligible studies including 10 different types of interventions with 22,429 migraine patients were included. NMA results showed that compared to ubrogepant (25 mg and 50 mg) and zavegepant, lasmiditan (100 mg and 200 mg) exhibits an elevated probability of achieving pain relief within a 2-hour interval. Similarly, relative to zavegepant, rimegepant (75 mg) and ubrogepant (50 mg and 100 mg) demonstrate an enhanced likelihood of sustaining pain relief over a 24-hour period. Furthermore, in contrast to ubrogepant (25 mg) and lasmiditan (50 mg), rimegepant (75 mg) presents a heightened probability of achieving freedom from photophobia within 2 h. Regarding safety, lasmiditan carries the highest risk of adverse events, which are associated with an increased incidence of adverse effects, including dizziness, somnolence, asthenia, paresthesia, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: In this NMA, a spectrum of evidence ranging from very low to high levels underscores the favorable efficacy and tolerability of rimegepant 75 mg and ubrogepant 100 mg, positioning them as potential candidates for the acute management of migraine. Concurrently, lasmiditan (100 mg and 200 mg) exhibits notable efficacy, albeit accompanied by an increased susceptibility to adverse events. These findings should still be approached with caution, primarily due to the intrinsic limitations associated with indirect comparisons.
关键词
相关链接[Scopus记录]
收录类别
语种
英语
学校署名
其他
ESI学科分类
NEUROSCIENCE & BEHAVIOR
Scopus记录号
2-s2.0-85184082791
来源库
Scopus
引用统计
被引频次[WOS]:4
成果类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://sustech.caswiz.com/handle/2SGJ60CL/701455
专题南方科技大学医学院_公共卫生及应急管理学院
作者单位
1.Health Technology Assessment Center/Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center,School of Public Health,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou,199 Donggang West Road,730000,China
2.Evidence Based Medicine Center,School of Basic Medical Sciences,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou,199 Donggang West Road,730000,China
3.Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province,Lanzhou,730000,China
4.School of Public Health and Emergency Management,Southern University of Science and Technology,Shenzhen,China
5.Department of infection management,Gansu Provincial Hospital,Lanzhou,730000,China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Deng,Xinxin,Zhou,Liying,Liang,Cui,et al. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of lasmiditan and CGRP-antagonists for the acute treatment of migraine in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials[J]. The journal of headache and pain,2024,25(1).
APA
Deng,Xinxin.,Zhou,Liying.,Liang,Cui.,Shang,Xue.,Hui,Xu.,...&Li,Xiuxia.(2024).Comparison of effectiveness and safety of lasmiditan and CGRP-antagonists for the acute treatment of migraine in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.The journal of headache and pain,25(1).
MLA
Deng,Xinxin,et al."Comparison of effectiveness and safety of lasmiditan and CGRP-antagonists for the acute treatment of migraine in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials".The journal of headache and pain 25.1(2024).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
原文链接
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
导出为Excel格式
导出为Csv格式
Altmetrics Score
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Deng,Xinxin]的文章
[Zhou,Liying]的文章
[Liang,Cui]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Deng,Xinxin]的文章
[Zhou,Liying]的文章
[Liang,Cui]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Deng,Xinxin]的文章
[Zhou,Liying]的文章
[Liang,Cui]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
[发表评论/异议/意见]
暂无评论

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。