The impacts of profile concavity on turbidite deposits: Insights from the submarine canyons on global continental margins

Yu，Kaiqi1; Miramontes，Elda2,3; Cartigny，Matthieu J.B.4; Yang，Yuping1; Xu，Jingping1

2024-06-01

10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109157

Geomorphology   影响因子和分区

0169-555X

Submarine canyons are primary conduits for turbidity currents transporting terrestrial sediments, nutrients, pollutants and organic carbon to the deep sea. The concavity in the longitudinal profile of these canyons (i.e. the downstream flattening rate along the profiles) influences the transport processes and results in variations in turbidite thickness, impacting the transfer and burial of particles. To better understand the controlling mechanisms of canyon concavity on the distribution of turbidite deposits, here we investigate the variation in sediment accumulation as a function of canyon concavity of 20 different modern submarine canyons, distributed on global continental margins. In order to effectively assess the isolated impact of the concavity of 20 different canyons, a series of two-dimensional, depth-resolved numerical simulations are conducted. Simulation results show that the highly concave profile (e.g. Surveyor and Horizon) tends to concentrate the turbidite deposits mainly at the slope break, while nearly straight profiles (e.g. Amazon and Congo) result in deposition focused at the canyon head. Moderately concave profiles with a smoother canyon floor (e.g. Norfolk-Washington and Mukluk) effectively facilitate the downstream transport of suspended sediments in turbidity currents. Furthermore, smooth and steep upper reaches of canyons commonly contribute to sediment bypass (i.e. Mukluk and Chirikof), while low slope angles lead to deposition at upper reaches (i.e. Bounty and Valencia). At lower reaches, the distribution of turbidite deposits is consistent with the occurrence of hydraulic jumps. Under the influence of different canyon concavities, three types of deposition patterns are inferred in this study, and verified by comparison with observed turbidite deposits on the modern or paleo-canyon floor. This study demonstrates a potential difference in sediment transport efficiency of submarine canyons with different concavities, which has potential consequences for sediment and organic carbon transport through submarine canyons.

Hydrodynamics Seafloor morphology Submarine canyon Turbidite deposition Turbidity currents

SCI

英语

第一 ; 通讯

GEOSCIENCES

2-s2.0-85188448896

Scopus

1.Department of Ocean Science and Engineering,Southern University of Science and Technology,Shenzhen,1088 Xueyuan Rd., Guangdong,518055,China
2.MARUM-Center for Marine Environmental Sciences,University of Bremen,Bremen,Germany
3.Faculty of Geosciences,University of Bremen,Bremen,Germany
4.Department of Geography,Durham University,Durham,South Road,DH1 3LE,United Kingdom

Yu，Kaiqi,Miramontes，Elda,Cartigny，Matthieu J.B.,et al. The impacts of profile concavity on turbidite deposits: Insights from the submarine canyons on global continental margins[J]. Geomorphology,2024,454.

Yu，Kaiqi,Miramontes，Elda,Cartigny，Matthieu J.B.,Yang，Yuping,&Xu，Jingping.(2024).The impacts of profile concavity on turbidite deposits: Insights from the submarine canyons on global continental margins.Geomorphology,454.

Yu，Kaiqi,et al."The impacts of profile concavity on turbidite deposits: Insights from the submarine canyons on global continental margins".Geomorphology 454(2024).