中文版 | English
题名

高管腐败与股东监控的经济理论分析

其他题名
ECONOMIC THEORY ANALYSIS OF EXECUTIVE CORRUPTION AND SHAREHOLDERS’MONITORING
姓名
姓名拼音
HUANG Xuechuan
学号
12232954
学位类型
硕士
学位专业
0251 金融
学科门类/专业学位类别
02 经济学
导师
杨招军
导师单位
商学院
论文答辩日期
2024-05-16
论文提交日期
2024-07-01
学位授予单位
南方科技大学
学位授予地点
深圳
摘要

现代股份制公司的股东与管理层之间会形成一种典型的委托代理关系。企业股东往往不具备专业的企业管理能力,他们并不会直接参与公司的管理决策。为了投资能够获得与其承担的风险相适应的回报,股东们常常将公司的运营权委托给具备专业知识和经验的职业经理人。这种安排使得公司决策过程更为高效,但也引入了代理问题,代理人可能会利用其掌握的控制权和信息优势追求私人利益,进行腐败行为,损害委托人的利益和公司总价值。因此,股东需要监控企业管理人的腐败行为,保护自身权益。

为了研究这一问题,本文构建了一个连续时间委托代理模型,假定代理人的腐败行为不仅会导致企业现金流的流失,还会对企业现金流增长产生负面影响。代理人在进行腐败行为时会付出一定的腐败成本,其腐败成本受委托人监控力度的影响。在模型求解上,本文利用倒向递推的方法分别求得代理人、委托人与债权人的价值函数。本还还利用MATLAB进行数值模拟,分析了不同情形下代理人腐败水平与委托人监控水平的变化以及道德风险下的企业最优资本结构问题。数值结果表明,企业债息的发放有利于缓解代理问题,在最优资本结构下,委托人与代理人最优策略受代理人薪酬激励、企业廉洁度以及企业税率的影响。

本文的核心贡献在于将股东的内部监控与高管腐败成本联系在一起。通过构建理论模型,我们研究了代理人腐败情形下委托人的最优监控问题与企业的最优资本结构问题,为公司治理以及企业融资决策提供参考。

关键词
语种
中文
培养类别
独立培养
入学年份
2022
学位授予年份
2024-06
参考文献列表

[1]改革再深化 持续释放国企活力[R]. 人民日报, 2023.
[2] DYCK A, ZINGALES L. Private benefits of control: An international comparison[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2004, 59(2): 537-600.
[3] JU N, WAN X. Optimal compensation and pay-performance sensitivity in a continuous-time principal-agent model[J]. Management Science, 2012, 58(3): 641-657.
[4] MU C, WANG A, YANG J. Optimal capital structure with moral hazard[J]. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2017, 48: 326-338.
[5] SHLEIFER A, VISHNY R W. Corruption*[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993, 108(3): 599-617.
[6] LAMBSDORFF J G. The institutional economics of corruption and reform: Theory, evidence and policy[M]. Cambridge university press, 2007.
[7] SVENSSON J. Eight questions about corruption[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2005, 19(3): 19-42.
[8] UHLENBRUCK K, RODRIGUEZ P, DOH J, et al. The impact of corruption on entry strategy: Evidence from telecommunication projects in emerging economies[J]. Organization Science, 2006, 17(3): 402-414.
[9] CASTRO A, PHILLIPS N, ANSARI S. Corporate corruption: A review and an agenda for future research[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2020, 14(2): 935-968.
[10] PAUNOV C. Corruption's asymmetric impacts on firm innovation[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2016, 118: 216-231.
[11] KLITGAARD R. Controlling corruption[M]. Univ of California Press, 1988.
[12] PEARCE C L, MANZ C C, SIMS JR H P. The roles of vertical and shared leadership in the enactment of executive corruption: Implications for research and practice[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2008, 19(3): 353-359.
[13] YALAMOV T, BELEV B. Corporate governance: An antidote to corruption-examples/lessons learned in Bulgaria and transition countries[J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: AN ANIDOTE TO CORRUPTION, CIPE, 2002: 33-36.
[14] HUANG L J, SNELL R S. Turnaround, corruption and mediocrity: Leadership and governance in three state owned enterprises in Mainland China[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2003, 43: 111-124.
[15] BAHOO S, ALON I, PALTRINIERI A. Corruption in international business: A review and research agenda[J]. International Business Review, 2020, 29(4): 101660.
[16] 黄群慧. 管理腐败新特征与国有企业改革新阶段[J]. 中国工业经济, 2006(11): 52-59.
[17] 徐细雄. 企业高管腐败研究前沿探析[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2012, 34(4): 73-80.
[18] YAO S. Privilege and corruption: The problems of China's socialist market economy[J]. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 2002, 61(1): 279-299.
[19] JENSEN M C. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1993, 48(3): 831-880.
[20] RAJAN R G, WULF J. Are perks purely managerial excess?[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2006, 79(1): 1-33.
[21] 权小锋, 吴世农, 文芳. 管理层权力, 私有收益与薪酬操纵[J]. 经济研究, 2010(11): 73-87.
[22] BEASLEY M S, CARCELLO J V, HERMANSON D R, et al. Fraudulent financial reporting: 1987-1997: An Analysis of US Public Companies[J]. 1999
[23] JENSEN M C, MECKLING W H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(4): 305-360.
[24] MIRONOV M. Should one hire a corrupt CEO in a corrupt country?[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2015, 117(1): 29-42.
[25] YERMACK D. Flights of fancy: Corporate jets, CEO perquisites, and inferior shareholder returns[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2006, 80(1): 211-242.
[26] KASSEM R, HIGSON A W. External auditors and corporate corruption: Implications for external audit regulators[J]. Current Issues in Auditing, 2016, 10(1): P1-P10.
[27] XUAN Y. Empire-building or bridge-building? Evidence from new CEOs’ internal capital allocation decisions[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2009, 22(12): 4919-4948.
[28] BI W, LI J, XU W, et al. How corporate rent-seeking affects outward FDI——Empirical evidence based on A-share listed manufacturing companies[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2023, 58: 104266.
[29] DU Z, ZHENG L, LIN B. Does rent-seeking affect environmental regulation?: Evidence from the survey data of private enterprises in China[J]. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 2021, 30(6): 1-22.
[30] ZECKHAUSER R J, PRATT J W. Principals and agents: The structure of business[M]. Harvard Business School Press Boston, MA, 1985.
[31] HOLMSTROM B, MILGROM P. Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1987: 303-328.
[32] SCHARFSTEIN D S, STEIN J C. The dark side of internal capital markets: Divisional rent‐seeking and inefficient investment[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2000, 55(6): 2537-2564.
[33] KHOROSHILOV Y, NARAYANAN M. The role of profit-based and stock-based components in incentive compensation[J]. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2008, 17(3): 357-378.
[34] DEMARZO P M, SANNIKOV Y. Optimal security design and dynamic capital structure in a continuous‐time agency model[J]. the Journal of Finance, 2006, 61(6): 2681-2724.
[35] SANNIKOV Y. A Continuous-Time Version of the Principal-Agent Problem[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2008, 75(3): 957-984.
[36] MODIGLIANI F, MILLER M H. The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment[J]. The American Economic Review, 1958, 48(3): 261-297.
[37] LEWIS T R, DAVID E M S. Optimal Capital Structure in Agency Relationships[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1995, 26(3): 343-361.
[38] DOUGLAS A V. Capital structure and the control of managerial incentives[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2002, 8(4): 287-311.
[39] ADEOYE O A, ISLAM S M, ADEKUNLE A I. Optimal capital structure and the debtholder-manager conflicts of interests: a management decision model[J]. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2021, 16(4): 1070-1095.
[40] 李雪, 罗鹏飞, 杨招军. 税率不确定性下业绩敏感性债券对企业资本结构的影响[J]. 系统工程, 2017, 35(10): 42-48.
[41] WEISBACH M S. Optimal executive compensation versus managerial power: A review of Lucian Bebchuk and Jesse Fried's pay without performance: The unfulfilled promise of executive compensation[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2007, 45(2): 419-428.
[42] BEBCHUK L A, FRIED J M. Executive compensation as an agency problem[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2003, 17(3): 71-92.
[43] 唐跃军. 国企改革的实现途径[J]. 国是咨询, 2017
[44] 倪得兵 唐. 代理人努力决策柔性的分成制委托代理模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2005(03): 15-23.
[45] GRYGLEWICZ S, MAYER S, MORELLEC E. Screening and monitoring of corporate loans[J]. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper, 2022(21-82)
[46] LELAND H E. Corporate debt value, bond covenants, and optimal capital structure[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1994, 49(4): 1213-1252.
[47] MORELLEC E, WANG N. Capital structure, investment, and private benefits of control[J]. Investment, and Private Benefits of Control, 2004
[48] HACKBARTH D, MAUER D C. Optimal priority structure, capital structure, and investment[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2012, 25(3): 747-796.
[49] SARKAR S, ZHANG C. Underinvestment and the design of performance-sensitive debt[J]. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2015, 37: 240-253.

所在学位评定分委会
金融
国内图书分类号
F832.5
来源库
人工提交
成果类型学位论文
条目标识符http://sustech.caswiz.com/handle/2SGJ60CL/778812
专题商学院_金融系
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
黄雪氚. 高管腐败与股东监控的经济理论分析[D]. 深圳. 南方科技大学,2024.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可 操作
12232954-黄雪氚-金融系.pdf(3085KB)----限制开放--请求全文
个性服务
原文链接
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
导出为Excel格式
导出为Csv格式
Altmetrics Score
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[黄雪氚]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[黄雪氚]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[黄雪氚]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
[发表评论/异议/意见]
暂无评论

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。