[1] YADAV N, VERMA S, CHIKHALKAR R. Online reviews towards reducing risk[J/OL]. Journal of Tourism Futures, 2023, 1-18.
[2] YE Q, LAW R, GU B, et al. The influence of user-generated content on traveler behavior: An empirical investigation on the effects of e-word-of-mouth to hotel online bookings[J/OL]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, 27(2): 634-639.
[3] YANG M, ZHENG Z, MOOKERJEE V. Prescribing response strategies to manage customer opinions: A stochastic differential equation approach[J/OL]. Information Systems Research, 2019, 30(2): 351-374.
[4] LEE Y J, KEELING K B, URBACZEWSKI A. The Economic Value of Online User Reviews with Ad Spending on Movie Box-Office Sales[J/OL]. Information Systems Frontiers, 2019, 21(4): 829-844.
[5] YE Q, LAW R, GU B. The impact of online user reviews on hotel room sales[J/OL]. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2009, 28(1): 180-182.
[6] KETELAAR P E, WILLEMSEN L M, SLEVEN L, et al. The Good, the Bad, and the Expert: How Consumer Expertise Affects Review Valence Effects on Purchase Intentions in Online Product Reviews[J/OL]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2015, 20(6): 649-666. DOI:10.1111/jcc4.12139.
[7] VERMEULEN I E, SEEGERS D. Tried and tested: The impact of online hotel reviews on consumer consideration[J/OL]. Tourism Management, 2009, 30(1): 123-127.
[8] FINK L, ROSENFELD L, RAVID G. Longer online reviews are not necessarily better[J/OL]. International Journal of Information Management, 2018, 39(May 2017): 30-37.
[9] HUANG A H, CHEN K, YEN D C, et al. A study of factors that contribute to online review helpfulness[J/OL]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015, 48: 17-27.
[10] ZHANG Z Z, LIANG S, LI H, et al. Booking now or later: Do online peer reviews matter?[J/OL]. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2019, 77(April 2018): 147-158.
[11] KUAN K K Y, HUI K L, PRASARNPHANICH P, et al. What makes a review voted? An empirical investigation of review voting in online review systems[J/OL]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2015, 16(1): 48-71.
[12] CHEONG J W, MUTHALY S, KUPPUSAMY M, et al. The study of online reviews and its relationship to online purchase intention for electronic products among the millennials in Malaysia[J/OL]. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 2020, 32(7): 1519-1538.
[13] LEE J, KIM Y K. Online Reviews of restaurants: Expectation-confirmation theory[J/OL]. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality and Tourism, 2020, 21(5): 582-599.
[14] BANERJEE S, CHUA A Y K. A theoretical framework to identify authentic online reviews[J/OL]. Online Information Review, 2014, 38(5): 634-649.
[15] FORMAN C, GHOSE A, WIESENFELD B. Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets[J/OL]. Information Systems Research, 2008, 19(3): 291-313.
[16] LIU Z, PARK S. What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites[J/OL]. Tourism Management, 2015, 47: 140-151.
[17] HOCHSTEIN R E, HARMELING C M, PERKO T. Toward a theory of consumer digital trust: Meta-analytic evidence of its role in the effectiveness of user-generated content[J/OL]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2023(1).
[18] DEANDREA D C, VAN DER HEIDE B, VENDEMIA M A, et al. How People Evaluate Online Reviews[J/OL]. Communication Research, 2018, 45(5): 719-736.
[19] CHEN M Y. Can two-sided messages increase the helpfulness of online reviews?[J/OL]. Online Information Review, 2016, 40(3): 316-332.
[20] YANG Q, LI C. Mozart or metallica, who makes you more attractive? A mediated moderation test of music, gender, personality, and attractiveness in cyberspace[J/OL]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, 29(6): 2796-2804.
[21] 易梦馨, 吴江, 蔡婧璇等. 信任视角下基于文本图片多源信息的在线择医行为研究[J]. 情报科学, 2021, 39(9): 84-93.
[22] KARIMI S, WANG F. Online review helpfulness: Impact of reviewer profile image[J/OL]. Decision Support Systems, 2017, 96: 39-48.
[23] XU Q. Should I trust him? The effects of reviewer profile characteristics on eWOM credibility[J/OL]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 33: 136-144.
[24] DION K, BERSCHEID E, WALSTER E. What is beautiful is good[J/OL]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24(3): 285-290.
[25]
[25] LI M, TRIANA M del C, BYUN S Y, et al. Pay for beauty? A contingent perspective of CEO facial attractiveness on CEO compensation[J/OL]. Human Resource Management, 2021, 60(6): 843-862.
[26] WONG J S, PENNER A M. Gender and the returns to attractiveness[J/OL]. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 2016, 44: 113-123.
[27] WHITE A E, KENRICK D T, NEUBERG S L. Beauty at the ballot box: Disease threats predict preferences for physically attractive leaders[J/OL]. Psychological Science, 2013, 24(12): 2429-2436.
[28] QI Y, YING J. Gender biases in the accuracy of facial judgments: Facial attractiveness and perceived socioeconomic status[J/OL]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13(May): 1-9.
[29] HOSODA M, STONE-ROMERO E F, COATS G. Job-related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2003, 56(2): 431-462.
[30] WONGKITRUNGRUENG A, HILDEBRAND D, SEN S, et al. Is salesperson attractiveness a boon or a bane? The moderating role of perceived labor cost-to-price ratio in retail bargaining[J/OL]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2020, 30(3): 447-465.
[31] ARGO J J, DAHL D W. Standards of beauty: The impact of mannequins in the retail context[J/OL]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2018, 44(5): 974-990.
[32] SAMPER A, YANG L W, DANIELS M E. Beauty, effort, and misrepresentation: How beauty work affects judgments of moral character and consumer preferences[J/OL]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2018, 45(1): 126-147.
[33] CRYDER C, BOTTI S, SIMONYAN Y. The charity beauty premium: Satisfying donors’ want versus should desires[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2016, 54(4): 605-618.
[34] JOHNSON S K, SITZMANN T, NGUYEN A T. Don’t hate me because I’m beautiful: Acknowledging appearance mitigates the “beauty is beastly” effect[J/OL]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2014, 125(2): 184-192.
[35] LIN L, HOEGG J A, AQUINO K. When beauty backfires: The effects of server attractiveness on consumer taste perceptions[J/OL]. Journal of Retailing, 2018, 94(3): 296-311.
[36] TOWNSEND C. The price of beauty: Differential effects of design elements with and without cost implications in nonprofit donor solicitations[J/OL]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2017, 44(4): 794-815.
[37] LEE S, PITESA M, PILLUTLA M, et al. When beauty helps and when it hurts: An organizational context model of attractiveness discrimination in selection decisions[J/OL]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2015, 128: 15-28.
[38] LI Y, ZHANG C, FANG S. Can beauty save service failures? The role of recovery employees’ physical attractiveness in the tourism industry[J/OL]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 141(December 2021): 100-110.
[39] PRANATA I, SUSILO W. Are the most popular users always trustworthy? The case of Yelp[J/OL]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2016, 20: 30-41.
[40] HARRISON-WALKER L J, JIANG Y. Suspicion of online product reviews as fake: Cues and consequences[J/OL]. Journal of Business Research, 2023, 160(September 2021): 113780.
[41] KIM J M, PARK K K cheon, MARIANI M M. Do online review readers react differently when exposed to credible versus fake online reviews?[J/OL]. Journal of Business Research, 2023, 154(October 2022): 113377.
[42] WANG Q, ZHANG W, LI J, et al. Effect of online review sentiment on product sales: The moderating role of review credibility perception[J/OL]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2022, 133(September 2021): 107272.
[43] SEN S, LERMAN D. Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the web[J/OL]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2007, 21(4): 76-94.
[44] HU N, ZHANG J, PAVLOU P A. Overcoming the J-shaped distribution of product reviews[J/OL]. Communications of the ACM, 2009, 52(10): 144-147.
[45] LIU Y, BI J W, FAN Z P. Ranking products through online reviews: A method based on sentiment analysis technique and intuitionistic fuzzy set theory[J/OL]. Information Fusion, 2017, 36: 149-161.
[46] TANG T, FANG E, WANG F. Is neutral really neutral? The effects of neutral user-generated content on product sales[J/OL]. Journal of Marketing, 2014, 78(4): 41-58.
[47] CHEUNG M, LUO C, SIA C, et al. Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational and normative determinants of on-line consumer recommendations[J/OL]. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2009, 13(4): 9-38.
[48] LIU Y. Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2006, 70(July): 74-89.
[49] LI M, HUANG L, TAN C H, et al. Helpfulness of online product reviews as seen by consumers: Source and content features[J/OL]. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2013, 17(4): 101-136.
[50] BAEK H, AHN J, CHOI Y. Helpfulness of online consumer reviews: Readers’ objectives and review cues[J/OL]. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2012, 17(2): 99 – 126.
[51] FOGG B J, MARSHALL J, LARAKI O, et al. What makes web sites credible? A report on a large quantitative study[C/OL]//Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. 2001: 61-68.
[52] KRUGLANSKI A W, CHEN X, PIERRO A, et al. Persuasion according to the unimodel: Implications for cancer communication[J/OL]. Journal of Communication, 2006, 56(SUPPL.): 105-122.
[53] ZHANG D, WU P, WU C. The role of key online reviews in affecting online hotel booking: an empirical investigation[J/OL]. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 2022, 122(2): 499-520.
[54] BAR M, NETA M, LINZ H. Very first impressions[J/OL]. Emotion, 2006, 6(2): 269-278.
[55] TODOROV A, OLIVOLA C Y, DOTSCH R, et al. Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance[J/OL]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2015, 66: 519-545.
[56] KOMORI M, KAWAMURA S, ISHIHARA S. Effect of averageness and sexual dimorphism on the judgment of facial attractiveness[J/OL]. Vision Research, 2009, 49(8): 862-869.
[57] BAUDOUIN J Y, TIBERGHIEN G. Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women[J/OL]. Acta Psychologica, 2004, 117(3): 313-332.
[58] 洪开毅, 张媛君, 胡治国等. 模糊度对外貌吸引力评价的影响及性别差异[J/OL]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2023, 31(1): 52-57.
[59] BAGOZZI R P, MOORE D J. Public service advertisements: Emotions and empathy guide prosocial behavior[J/OL]. Journal of Marketing, 1994, 58(1): 56.
[60] SMALL D A, VERROCHI N M. The face of need: Facial emotion expression on charity advertisements[J/OL]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2009, 46(6): 777-787.
[61] ALAEI R, DESKA J C, HUGENBERG K, et al. People attribute humanness to men and women differently based on their facial appearance[J/OL]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2022, 123(2): 400-422.
[62] WANG X, LIU S, HAN S, et al. Roles of social knowledge and sexual dimorphism in the evaluation of facial attractiveness[J/OL]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2020, 88(818): 103963.
[63] 管永昊, 吴佳敏, 贺伊琦等. 高颜值能增加个人收入吗[J]. 财贸研究, 2019, 9: 16-28.
[64] 谭远发, 刘昌宇. 高学历能消除劳动力市场上的容貌歧视吗？[J]. 人口学刊, 2019, 41(5): 18-34.
[65] REINGEN P H, KERNAN J B. Social perception and interpersonal influence: Some consequences of the physical attractiveness stereotype in a personal selling setting[J/OL]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1993, 2(1): 25-38.
[66] PENG L, CUI G, CHUNG Y, et al. The Faces of Success: Beauty and Ugliness Premiums in e-Commerce Platforms[J/OL]. Journal of Marketing, 2020, 84(4): 67-85.
[67] LANGLOIS J H, KALAKANIS L, RUBENSTEIN A J, et al. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review[J/OL]. Psychological Bulletin, 2000, 126(3): 390-414.
[68]
[68] O’DOHERTY J, KRINGELBACH M L, ROLLS E T, et al. Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex[J/OL]. Nature Neuroscience, 2001, 4(1): 95-102.
[69] TSUKIURA T, CABEZA R. Shared brain activity for aesthetic and moral judgments: Implications for the Beauty-is-Good stereotype[J/OL]. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2011, 6(1): 138-148.
[70] FISHER R J, MA Y. The price of being beautiful: Negative effects of attractiveness on empathy for children in need[J/OL]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2014, 41(2): 436-450.
[71] EAGLY A H, ASHMORE R D, MAKHIJANI M G, et al. What Is Beautiful Is Good, But...: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research on the Physical Attractiveness Stereotype[J/OL]. Psychological Bulletin, 1991, 110(1): 109-128.
[72] CLIFFORD M M, WALSTER E, CLIFFORD M M, et al. The Effect of Physical Attractiveness on Teacher Expectations[J]. Sociology of Education, 1973, 46(2): 248-258.
[73] CALVO M G, GUTIÉRREZ-GARCÍA A, BELTRÁN D. Neural time course and brain sources of facial attractiveness vs. trustworthiness judgment[J/OL]. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 2018, 18(6): 1233-1247.
[74] MAESTRIPIERI D, HENRY A, NICKELS N. Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology[J/OL]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2017, 40.
[75] BAZZINI D, CURTIN L, JOSLIN S, et al. Do Animated Disney Characters Portray and Promote the Beauty-Goodness Stereotype?[J/OL]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2010, 40(10): 2687-2709.
[76] SMITH R K, VANDELLEN M R, TON L A N. Makeup Who You Are: Self-Expression Enhances the Perceived Authenticity and Public Promotion of Beauty Work[J/OL]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2021, 48(1): 102-122.
[77] GHEORGHIU A I, CALLAN M J, SKYLARK W J. Facial appearance affects science communication[J/OL]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017, 114(23): 5970-5975.
[78] KANAZAWA S, STILL M C. Is there really a beauty premium or an ugliness penalty on earnings?[J/OL]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2018, 33(2): 249-262.
[79] CHANG C T, LEE Y K. Framing charity advertising: Influences of message framing, image valence, and temporal framing on a charitable appeal[J/OL]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2009, 39(12): 2910-2935.
[80] PERRETT D I, LEE K J, PENTON-VOAK I, et al. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness[J/OL]. Nature, 1998, 394(6696): 884-887.
[81] RUSSELL R. Sex, beauty, and the relative luminance of facial features[J/OL]. Perception, 2003, 32(9): 1093-1107.
[82] DUAN Y, HSIEH T shih S, WANG R R, et al. Entrepreneurs’ facial trustworthiness, gender, and crowdfunding success[J/OL]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2020, 64(July): 101693.
[83] MANER J K, KENRICK D T, BECKER D V, et al. Sexually selective cognition: Beauty captures the mind of the beholder[J/OL]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 85(6): 1107-1120.
[84] TIAN Y, LI L, YIN H, et al. Gender differences in the effect of facial attractiveness on perception of time[J/OL]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, 10(JUN).
[85] OH D W, BUCK E A, TODOROV A. Revealing hidden gender biases in competence impressions of faces[J/OL]. Psychological Science, 2019, 30(1): 65-79.
[86] BUUNK B P, DIJKSTRA P, FETCHENHAUER D, et al. Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels[J/OL]. Personal Relationships, 2002, 9(3): 271-278.
[87] HELM JR. H W, HALL A, BAILEY K G D. Generational gender differences in mate selection[J/OL]. North American Journal of Psychology, 2020, 22: 111.
[88] WALTER K V, CONROY-BEAM D, BUSS D M, et al. Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: A large-scale replication[J/OL]. Psychological Science, 2020, 31(4): 408-423.
[89] JONASON P K, MARSH K, DIB O, et al. Is smart sexy? Examining the role of relative intelligence in mate preferences[J/OL]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2019, 139(November 2018): 53-59.
[90] RHODES G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty[J/OL]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2006, 57: 199-226.
[91] BUSS D M, SCHMITT D P. Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating[J/OL]. Psychological Review, 1993, 100(2): 204-232.
[92] SPRECHER S, SULLIVAN Q, HATFIELD E. Mate selection preferences: Gender differences examined in a national sample[J/OL]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 66(6): 1074-1080.
[93] LI N P, KENRICK D T, BAILEY J M, et al. The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs[J/OL]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 82(6): 947-955.
[94] SHACKELFORD T K, SCHMITT D P, BUSS D M. Universal dimensions of human mate preferences[J/OL]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2005, 39(2): 447-458.
[95] DROGOSZ L M, LEVY P E. Another look at the effects of appearance, gender, and job type on performance-based decisions[J/OL]. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1996, 20(3): 437-445.
[96] KLEISNER K, CHVÁTALOVÁ V, FLEGR J. Perceived intelligence is associated with measured intelligence in men but not women[J/OL]. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(3).
[97] EAGLY A H. Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology.[M/OL] //American Psychologist. US: American Psychological Association, 1997: 1380-1383.
[98] RUDMAN L A, MOSS-RACUSIN C A, PHELAN J E, et al. Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders[J/OL]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2012, 48(1): 165-179.
[99] HARTMANN P, APAOLAZA-IBÁÑEZ V. Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: The roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern[J/OL]. Journal of Business Research, 2012, 65(9): 1254-1263.
[100] LEE S, JEONG M. Enhancing online brand experiences: An application of congruity theory[J/OL]. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2014, 40: 49-58.
[101] CORNEILLE O, MONIN B, PLEYERS G. Is positivity a cue or a response option? Warm glow vs evaluative matching in the familiarity for attractive and not-so-attractive faces[J/OL]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2005, 41(4): 431-437.
[102] OSGOOD C E, TANNENBAUM P H. The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change.[M/OL] // Psychological Review. US: American Psychological Association, 1955: 42-55.
[103] CAVAZZA N, GRAZIANI A R, GUIDETTI M. Impression formation via #foodporn: Effects of posting gender-stereotyped food pictures on instagram profiles[J/OL]. Appetite, 2020, 147(December 2019).
[104] FABRE E F, CAUSSE M, PESCIARELLI F, et al. The responders’ gender stereotypes modulate the strategic decision-making of proposers playing the ultimatum game[J/OL]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016, 7(JAN): 1-9.
[105] KARK R, EAGLY A H. Gender and leadership: Negotiating the labyrinth: Volume 2: Gender research in social and applied psychology[M/OL]. //New York, NY: Springer New York, 2010: 443-468.
[106] RUDMAN L A, FAIRCHILD K. Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: the role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance.[J/OL]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2004, 87 2: 157-176.
[107] HEILMAN M E, OKIMOTO T G. Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: the implied communality deficit.[J/OL]. The Journal of applied psychology, 2007, 92 1: 81-92.
[108] EAGLY A H, KARAU S J. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders[J/OL]. Psychological Review, 2002, 109(3): 573-598.
[109] EAGLY A H, NATER C, MILLER D I, et al. Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018.[J/OL]. The American psychologist, 2020, 75(3): 301-315.
[110] FISKE S T, CUDDY A J C, GLICK P, et al. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition[J/OL]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 82(6): 878-902.
[111] HEILMAN M E. Gender stereotypes and workplace bias[J/OL]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2012, 32: 113-135.
[112] HEILMAN M E. Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder[J/OL]. Journal of Social Issues, 2001, 57(4): 657-674.
[113] RUDMAN L A, GLICK P. Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers.[M/OL]//Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. US: American Psychological Association, 1999: 1004-1010.
[114] TIMMING A, BAUMANN C, GOLLAN P. Consumer preferences for gender typicality in front-line services staff in the United States vis-à-vis South Korea: an experimental approach[J/OL]. European Journal of Marketing, 2020, 54(8): 1839-1864.
[115] SHAFFER D R, JOHNSON R D. Effects of occupational choice and sex‐role preferences on the attractiveness of competent men and women[J/OL]. Journal of Personality, 1980, 48(4): 505-519.
[116] LAUGHLIN G H M C. SMOG grading —– a new readability formula[J]. JOURNAL OF READING, 1969, 12(8): 639-646.
[117] HUTTO C J, GILBERT E. VADER: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text [J]. Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2014: 216-225.
[118] CHEN P yu, DHANASOBHON S, SMITH M D. All reviews are not created equal: The disaggregate impact of reviews and reviewers at Amazon.Com[J/OL]. Information Systems & Economics, 2008.
[119] MOORE S G. Attitude predictability and helpfulness in online reviews: The role of explained actions and reactions[J/OL]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2015, 42(1): 30-44.
[120] GUPTA P, HARRIS J. How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective[J/OL]. Journal of Business Research, 2010, 63(9-10): 1041-1049.
[121] CAO Q, DUAN W, GAN Q. Exploring determinants of voting for the “helpfulness” of online user reviews: A text mining approach[J/OL]. Decision Support Systems, 2011, 50(2): 511-521.
[122] SCHINDLER1 R M, BICKART B. Perceived helpfulness of online consumer reviews: The role of message content and style[J/OL]. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 2012, 11: 234–243.
[123] BAKHSHI S, KANUPARTHY P, SHAMMA D A. Understanding Online Reviews: Funny, Cool or Useful?[C/OL]//Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work \& Social Computing. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2015: 1270–1276.
[124] LI H, ZHANG Z, MENG F, et al. Is peer evaluation of consumer online reviews socially embedded? – An examination combining reviewer’s social network and social identity[J/OL]. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2017, 67(June): 143-153.
[125] JEON J, KIM E, WANG X, et al. Predicting on restaurant’s hygiene rating: Does customer review emotion and content matter?[J/OL]. British Food Journal, 2023, 125(11): 3871-3887.
[126] TOBIN J. Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk[J/OL]. Review of Economic Studies, 1958, 25(2): 65-86.
[127] IMBENS G W, RUBIN D B. Causal inference for statistics, social, and biomedical sciences: An introduction[M/OL]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
[128] FISHER R A. XV.—The Correlation between relatives on the supposition of mendelian inheritance.[J/OL]. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1919, 52(2): 399-433.
[129] MA D S, CORRELL J, WITTENBRINK B. The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data[J/OL]. Behavior Research Methods, 2015, 47(4): 1122-1135.
[130] MCKINNEY V, YOON K, ZAHEDI F. The measurement of Web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach[J/OL]. Information Systems Research, 2002, 13(3): 296-315.
[131] MATHIEU J E, DESHON R P, BERGH D D. Mediational inferences in organizational research: Then, now, and beyond[J/OL]. Organizational Research Methods, 2008, 11(2): 203-223.
[132] MACKINNON D P, LOCKWOOD C M, HOFFMAN J M, et al. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects.[J/OL]. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83-104.
[133] BARON R M, KENNY D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.[J/OL]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173-1182.
[134] HAYES A F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach.[M]//Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press, 2013.
[135] GHASEMAGHAEI M, ESLAMI S P, DEAL K, et al. Reviews’ length and sentiment as correlates of online reviews’ ratings[J/OL]. Internet Research, 2018, 28(3): 544-563.
[136] ZHANG K, LI S K, NG S. Sizes are gendered: The effect of size cues in brand names on brand stereotyping[J/OL]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2022, 49(2): 252-267.
[137] PANG J, DING Y. Blending package shape with the gender dimension of brand image: How and why ? [J/OL]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2021, 38(1): 216-231.
[138] DAI X, LIN Y (Anna), LIANG J, et al. Appearance for females, functionality for males? The false lay belief about gender difference in product preference[J/OL]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2023: ucad054.
[139] WU R, WU H H, WANG C L. Why is a picture ‘worth a thousand words’? Pictures as information in perceived helpfulness of online reviews[J/OL]. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 2021, 45(3): 364-378.
[140] ZHANG M, ZHAO H, CHEN H (Allan). How much is a picture worth? Online review picture background and its impact on purchase intention[J/OL]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 139(January 2021): 134-144.
修改评论