对抗人机合作系统偏见：生成模型在网络结构优化中的应用

在数字时代，人机交互在众多领域中已经成为常态。特别是在人机协作领域， 人类与机器代理依据特定协议协同合作，以达成共同的任务目标。尽管AI技术已 取得了显著的进展，但人机协作中的偏见仍然是一个阻碍人机协作进一步发展的 关键问题。 针对这一问题，我们深入探讨了人机协作网络的构造与核心属性，并介绍各 种经典的博弈模型及其和人机博弈的关系。我们提出了通过优化网络结构和网络 动态部分来最小化偏见对人机合作网络整体效率的影响。为了验证这一猜想，本 文构建了一种创新的混合人机合作系统，并提出了一个基于BA网络的改进模型。 我们详细介绍了该系统和模型的构建方法和实现细节，通过具体指标测量了系统 中人机合作偏见的程度。 为了量化人机合作偏见并观察合作型AI的引入如何影响网络的行为，我们设 置了一系列的实验和模拟，主要关注网络平均合作率和收益率指标。结果表明，合 作型AI的引入可以在较短的时间内促使网络实现更高的合作率，但人机合作偏见 极大地抵消这种优势。另外，同质BA网络生成模型的参数对网络效率的影响，遵 循一个倒U型曲线。通过优化该参数，能够提升网络平均合作率20%的水平，能 够为理解和优化人机协作网络偏见提供一个框架。

[1] HENRICHJ. The Secret of Our Success[M]. Princeton University Press, 2015.
[2] NOWAKMA,HIGHFIELDR. SuperCooperators[M]. Canongate Edinburgh, 2011.
[3]WATTS D J, STROGATZ S H. Collective dynamics of ’small-world’ networks[J]. Nature, 1998, 393(6684): 440-442.
[4]BARABáSI A L, ALBERT R. Emergence of scaling in random networks[J]. Science, 1999, 286(5439): 509-512.
[5]
[6]BARABáSI A L, ALBERT R. Emergence of scaling in random networks[J]. Science, 1999, 286(5439): 509-512.
[7]NEWMANMEJ. Thestructure and function of complex networks[J]. SIAM Review, 2003, 45(2): 167-256.
[8]PASTOR-SATORRAS R, VESPIGNANI A. Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2001, 86(14): 3200-3203.
[9]ALBERT R, JEONG H, BARABáSI A L. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks[J]. Nature, 2000, 406(6794): 378-382.
[10] LESKOVECJ,KLEINBERGJ,FALOUTSOSC.Graphsovertime: densificationlaws,shrinking diameters and possible explanations[C]//Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining. ACM, 2005: 177-187.
[11] VáZQUEZ A, FLAMMINI A, MARITAN A, et al. Modeling of protein interaction networks [J]. Complexus, 2003, 1(1): 38-44
[12] NOWAKMA,SIGMUNDK. Evolution of indirect reciprocity[J]. Nature, 2005, 437(7063): 1291-1298.
[13] PERCM,SZOLNOKIA. Coevolutionary games: A mini review[J]. BioSystems, 2010, 99(2): 109-125.
[14] CORCHADOJM,BAJOJ,DEPAZY,etal. Intelligentenvironmentformonitoring alzheimer patients, agent technology for health care[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2008, 44: 382-396.
[15] VAN DOORN J, et al. Domo arigato mr. roboto: Emergence of automated social presence in organizational frontlines and customers’service experiences[J]. J. Service Res., 2017, 20: 43-58.
[16] ROBUV,etal. Anonlinemechanismformulti-unitdemandanditsapplicationtoplug-inhybrid electric vehicle charging[J]. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2013, 48: 175-230.
[17] RADFORDA,KIMJW,HALLACYC,etal. Learningtransferablevisualmodelsfromnatural language supervision[C]//International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2021: 87488763.
[18] BROWNTB,MANNB,RYDERN,etal.Languagemodelsarefew-shotlearners[J]. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2020, 33: 1877-1901.
[19] PANG B, LEE L. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis[J]. Foundations and Trends® in information retrieval, 2008, 2(1–2): 1-135.
[20] OPENAI. GPT-4 Technical Report[J]. OpenAI Blog, 2023.
[21] SILVER D, HUANG A, MADDISON C J, et al. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search[J]. Nature, 2016, 529(7587): 484-489.
[22] MNIHV,KAVUKCUOGLUK,SILVERD,etal.Playingatariwithdeepreinforcementlearning [A]. 2013.
[23] LECUNY,BENGIOY,HINTONG. Deeplearning[J]. Nature, 2015, 521(7553): 436-444.
[24] ZHENG W, LIU C, YANG B, et al. Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Perception Augmentation and Reasoning[J]. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13(7): 4227.
[25] BONABEAU E. Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002, 99: 7280-7287.
[26] KAHNEMAN D. Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics[J]. American economic review, 2003, 93: 1449-1475.
[27] GROOMV, NASS C. Can robots be teammates?: Benchmarks in human-robot teams[J]. Interaction Studies, 2007, 8: 483-500.
[28] BHATTACHARYA K, TAKKO T, MONSIVAIS D, et al. Group formation on a small-world: experiment and modelling[J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2019, 16: 20180814.
[29] NASHJRJF. Equilibrium points in n-person games[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 1950, 36(1): 48-49.
[30] NASHJRJ. Non-cooperative games[M]. Edward Elgar Publishing, 1996: 22-33.
[31] NISANN,ROUGHGARDENT,TARDOS￿,etal. Algorithmicgametheory[M]. Cambridge university press, 2007.
[32] PAPADIMITRIOUCH. Onthecomplexity of the parity argument and other inefficient proofs of existence[J]. Journal of Computer and system Sciences, 1994, 48(3): 498-532.
[33] KOLLERD,MEGIDDON,VONSTENGELB.Fastalgorithmsforfindingrandomizedstrategies in game trees[C]//Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing. ACM, 1994: 750-759.
[34] CRANDALL J W, OUDAH M, ISHOWO-OLOKO F, et al. Cooperating with machines[J]. Nature communications, 2018, 9(1): 233.
[35] ISHOWO-OLOKO F, BONNEFON J F, SOROYE Z, et al. Behavioural evidence for a transparency–efficiency tradeoff in human–machine cooperation[J]. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2019, 1(11): 517-521.
[36] SPORNSO,TONONIG,KOTTERR. Thehumanconnectome: astructural description of the human brain[J]. PLoS Comput Biol, 2005.
[37] 汪小帆,李翔,陈关荣. 网络科学导论[M]. 2012.
[38] LESKOVECJ,KLEINBERGJ,FALOUTSOSC.Graphevolution: Densificationandshrinking diameters[J]. ACM Transaction Knowledge Discovery from Data, 2007, 1(1): 2-42.
[39] ALBERT R, BARABáSI A L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2002, 74(1): 47.
[40] ERDOSP. Onrandom graphs[J]. Mathematicae, 1959, 6: 290-297.
[41] NEWMANMEJ,WATTSDJ. Scalingandpercolation in the small-world network model[J]. Physical Review E, 1999, 60(6): 7332-7342.
[42] LATORA V, MARCHIORI M. Efficient Behavior of Small-World Networks[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2001, 87(19): 198701.
[43] ALBERTR,JEONGH,BARABáSIAL. Diameter of the World-Wide Web[J]. Nature, 1999, 401(6749): 130-131.
[44] LI W, ZHANGS,ZHENGZ,etal. Untangling the network effects of productivity and prominence among scientists[J]. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 4907.
[45] DOROGOVTSEVSN,MENDESJFF.EvolutionofNetworks[J]. AdvancesinPhysics,2002, 51(4): 1079.
[46] KIESLERS,SPROULLL,WATERSK. Aprisoner’sdilemmaexperimentoncooperationwith people and human-like computers[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1996, 70 (1): 47.
[47] AXELRODR. TheEvolution of Cooperation[M]. Basic Books, 1984.
[48] NOWAKM,SIGMUNDK. Astrategyofwin-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game[J]. Nature, 1993, 364: 56-58.
[49] DREBER A, RAND D G, FUDENBERG D, et al. Winners don’t punish[J]. Nature, 2008, 452(7185): 348-351.
[50] JACKSONJ. Globalization, internationalization, and short-term stays abroad[J]. International journal of intercultural relations, 2008, 32(4): 349-358.
[51] SANTOS F C, SANTOS M D, PACHECO J M. Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games[J]. Nature, 2008, 454(7201): 213-216.
[52] EASLEYD,KLEINBERGJ. Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world[M]. Cambridge university press, 2010.
[53] SMITHJM. Evolution and the Theory of Games[M]. Cambridge university press, 1982.
[54] SMITHJM,PRICEGR. Thelogic of animal conflict[J]. Nature, 1973, 246(5427): 15-18.
[55] YANGY,WANGJ. Anoverviewofmulti-agent reinforcement learning from game theoretical perspective[A]. 2020.
[56] TRAULSENA,GLYNATSINE. Thefutureoftheoreticalevolutionarygametheory[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 2023, 378(1876): 20210508.
[57] KAY T, KELLER L, LEHMANN L. The evolution of altruism and the serial rediscovery of the role of relatedness[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2020, 117(46): 28894-28898.
[58] OSBORNEMJ. Anintroduction to game theory: Vol. 3[M]. Oxford university press, 2004.
[59] CENTOLAD.Thespreadofbehaviorinanonlinesocialnetworkexperiment[J]. science, 2010, 329(5996): 1194-1197.
[60] LEEE,KARIMIF,WAGNERC,etal. Homophilyandminority-group size explain perception biases in social networks[J]. Nat Hum Behav, 2019, 3: 1078-1087.
[61] PASTOR-SATORRASR,VáZQUEZA,VESPIGNANIA. Dynamicalandcorrelation properties of the internet[J]. Physical review letters, 2001, 87(25): 258701.
[62] NEWMAN M E. Assortative mixing in networks[J]. Physical review letters, 2002, 89(20): 208701